• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

L. Weissmann

Heitz v. State, No. 24A-CR-802, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 6, 2025).

June 9, 2025 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, L. Weissmann, P. Felix

When a trial court’s local practice conflicts with Criminal Rule 4(C), the local practice is invalid, and delays arising from noncompliance with such practices cannot be charged to defendants.

Schoeff v. State, No. 23A-CR-02163, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 26, 2024).

August 26, 2024 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: E. Tavitas, L. Weissmann, P. Mathias

While the Richardson actual-evidence test no longer applies to claims of substantive double jeopardy violations, it does apply to claims of procedural double jeopardy.

M.M. v. L.P., No. 23A-PO-2089, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 5, 2024).

August 5, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas, L. Weissmann

The trial court was not required to transfer a pending protection order case to the special judge handling parties’ post-dissolution matters when the protection order did not relate to any pending post-dissolution proceedings and did not impact parenting time.

Andrew Nemeth Properties, LLC v. Panzica, No. 23A-PL-1383, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 17, 2024).

April 22, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, L. Weissmann

A pre-formation oral contract may establish an LLC’s initial membership. Plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial on his unjust enrichment claim under Article 1, Section 20 of the Indiana Constitution.

Individual Members of the Medical Licensing Bd. of Ind.. v. Anonymous Plaintiff 1, No. 22A-PL-2938, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 4, 2024).

April 9, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, L. Weissmann, M. Bailey

Recognizes the doctrine of associational standing and affirms the trial court’s finding that plaintiffs are entitled to a preliminary injunction regarding the abortion law, but remands for a more narrowly tailored injunction.

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 5
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs