• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Juvenile

M.H. v. State, No. 22S-JV-251, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 19, 2023).

April 24, 2023 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: C. Goff, D. Molter, G. Slaughter, Supreme

When a decision implicates a new jurisdictional rule, as in K.C.G. v. State, courts are to apply the principle of non-retroactivity, rather than vacate a final judgment for voidness, unless the jurisdictional error compromised the reliability or fairness of the proceedings.

J.B. v. State, No. 22A-JV-612, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 20, 2023).

February 27, 2023 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Where a videotaped interview of a child victim is entered into evidence erroneously because it did not meet the cited exceptions to the rule against hearsay, where the defendant had no right to confront the child victim, and where the record contains no other evidence of the elements of the alleged delinquent act, the admission of the videotaped interview constitutes fundamental error.

In re K.V., LP, No. 22A-JC-987, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 13, 2023).

January 17, 2023 Filed Under: Civil, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

DCS was not required to make a reasonable effort to reunify children with foster parents when it was not in the children’s best interest. Foster parents were not entitled to intervene in CHINS case.

In re K.G., No. 22A-MI-502, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 6, 2022).

December 12, 2022 Filed Under: Civil, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Trial court did not have the statutory authority to grant request to amend child’s birth certificate to change child’s gender marker.

In re Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of P.B., No. 22A-JT-1397, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 22, 2022).

November 29, 2022 Filed Under: Civil, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

The clear and convincing evidence burden of proof in termination of parental rights cases satisfies the Indiana Constitution’s Due Course of Law Clause.

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 21
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe

Archive

Copyright © 2023 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs