Trial court properly granted TR 21(B)(1) motion for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction when plaintiff’s claim fell under the Worker’s Compensation Act. Plaintiff was an employee of defendant’s sibling corporation and the Act defines “employer” to expressly include “a parent corporation and its subsidiaries,” which “shall each be considered joint employers” of the injured employee.
P. Mathias
M.S. v. State, 24A-JV-715, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 5, 2024).
The exception to the dangerous possession of a firearm statute, parental permission to possess, is an affirmative defense and not an element of the offense.
Emslander v. Baine, No. 24A-DC-1138, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 18, 2024).
Technical noncompliance with the parent relocation statute is insufficient to support the grant of a relocation.
Autovest, LLC v. Abner, No. 24A-CC-1113, __N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 25, 2024).
Trial court erred as a matter of law by dismissing a complaint to renew a judgment that was filed under a new cause number.
State v. Brooks-Brown 24A-CR-627, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 16, 2024).
Evidence that a person was an alleged victim of human trafficking at the time of an alleged crime may be used to dispute the mens rea required to prove the charged crime.