• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Talley v. State, No. 45A05-1507-PC-1005, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 8, 2016).

February 8, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

Trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to seek bifurcation of SVF firearm possession charge from resisting law enforcement (RLE) charges; trial court would not have been obligated to grant bifurcation because evidence of prior conviction was relevant to RLE charge and could also have been used to strategic advantage in defending SVF charge.

Miles v. State, No. 32A01-1412-CR-509, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 8, 2016).

February 8, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Prosecutorial misconduct in closing-argument, showing slide highlighting defendant’s failure to produce evidence, was not fundamental error; trial court interrupted the slide and appropriately admonished the jury sua sponte, and defense did not move for mistrial.

Shane Keller v. State, No. 88S04-1506-CR-354, ___ N.E.3d ___, (Ind. Jan. 25, 2016).

February 2, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, M. Massa, Supreme

Jury instruction defining “dwelling” element of B-felony burglary was misleading and invaded the province of the jury. Burglary convictions therefore had to be reduced to Class C felonies.

Montgomery v. Louisiana, No. 14-280, ___ U.S. ___, (Jan. 25, 2016).

February 2, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: A. Kennedy, A. Scalia, C. Thomas, SCOTUS

Miller v. Alabama’s prohibition on mandatory life without parole for juvenile offenders announced a new substantive, not procedural, rule. Miller is therefore retroactive in cases of state collateral review.

Musacchio v. United States, No. 14-1095, ___ U.S. ___, (Jan. 25, 2016).

February 2, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Thomas, SCOTUS

Sufficiency of evidence review does not depend on how jury was instructed; it is judged against essential elements of the offense, not against erroneous jury instruction that included an additional element.
Statute of limitations defense was not jurisdictional and therefore could not be raised for the first time on appeal.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 156
  • Page 157
  • Page 158
  • Page 159
  • Page 160
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 328
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs