• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Gerth v. State, No. 29A02-1506-CR-693, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 18, 2016).

February 22, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Search warrant was not based on probable cause, when supported only by two uncorroborated tips from informants with insufficiently established credibility and good-faith exception did not apply in view of officer’s “reckless material omission of fact” relevant to credibility of one of the tips.

Holloway v. State, No. 71A04-1508-CR-1292, ___ N.E.3d ___, (Ind. Ct. App. Feb. 18, 2016).

February 22, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey, T. Crone

Intoxicated, agitated arrestee’s statements to arresting officer were sufficient to establish “true threat” and thus to support intimidation conviction.

Ward v. State, No. 49S02-1602-CR-96, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind., Feb. 19, 2016).

February 22, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, R. Rucker, Supreme

Domestic battery victim’s statements to forensic nurse identifying her attacker were not barred as testimonial hearsay because they were given for “primary purpose” of medical treatment, which includes “safety plan” for discharge.

Miller v. State, No. 49A05-1507-CR-789, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 9, 2016).

February 15, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Arrest for resisting law enforcement violated defendant’s well-established right to walk away; bare report of a “disturbance” did not give probable cause for arrest, nor did record support claim that she was stopped to be cited for jaywalking. Subsequent search incident to arrest therefore violated her Fourth Amendment rights.

State v. Hargrave, No. 82A01-1504-CR-137, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 2, 2016).

February 8, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb, N. Vaidik

A person who holds a CDL license at the time of committing a traffic violation may not participate in a diversion program or have judgment deferred on that conviction.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 154
  • Go to page 155
  • Go to page 156
  • Go to page 157
  • Go to page 158
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 328
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs