Domestic battery victim’s statements to forensic nurse identifying her attacker were not barred as testimonial hearsay because they were given for “primary purpose” of medical treatment, which includes “safety plan” for discharge.
Criminal
Miller v. State, No. 49A05-1507-CR-789, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 9, 2016).
Arrest for resisting law enforcement violated defendant’s well-established right to walk away; bare report of a “disturbance” did not give probable cause for arrest, nor did record support claim that she was stopped to be cited for jaywalking. Subsequent search incident to arrest therefore violated her Fourth Amendment rights.
State v. Hargrave, No. 82A01-1504-CR-137, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 2, 2016).
A person who holds a CDL license at the time of committing a traffic violation may not participate in a diversion program or have judgment deferred on that conviction.
Harbert v. State, No. 79A02-1412-CR-874, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 4, 2016).
Double-jeopardy protections did not entitle co-defendants to dismissal of charges after State’s witness violated motion in limine; court refused to adopt more liberal State-law standard for such claims.
Defendant was not entitled to relief from judgment based on “newly discovered evidence”; he did not have creditable evidence on hand, but merely wanted to use so-called “evidence” of subsequent news stories as excuse for further discovery in hopes of obtaining exonerating evidence.
State v. Mooney, No. 82A04-1505-CR-266, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 4, 2016).
BMV was not entitled to relief from judgment letting OWI defendants reinstate drivers’ licenses without proof of SR22 insurance; regardless of merits of the order, BMV failed to make threshold showing of mistake, surprise, or excusable neglect.