• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Coleman v. State, No. 47A01-1506-IF-659, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Jan. 19, 2016).

January 25, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

Speed-limit sign facing southbound traffic, reducing speed limit from 55 to 35 mph, was ineffective against northbound motorist, despite county ordinance setting 35 mph speed limit unless otherwise designated; by state law, default speed limit for the road was 55 mph unless “appropriate signs giving notice of the altered limit are erected on the street or highway.”

Rhodes v. State, No. 49A02-1503-CR-173, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Jan. 19, 2016).

January 25, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes, M. May, T. Crone

Inventory search of defendant’s vehicle was unconstitutional, absent proof of existence of (or compliance with) established police procedures for such searches.

Kansas v. Carr, No. 14-449, ___ U.S. ___ (Jan. 20, 2016).

January 25, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: A. Scalia, S. Sotomayor, SCOTUS

The Eighth Amendment does not require capital-sentencing courts to instruct a jury that mitigating circumstances need not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Joint capital-sentencing proceeding did not violate defendants’ Eighth Amendment right to an “individualized sentencing determination.”

Garcia v. State, No. 49S05-1505-CR-335, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Jan. 21, 2016).

January 25, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Searching contents of pill container, which had already been seized incident to lawful arrest, was reasonable under the Indiana Constitution.

State v. Hancock, No. 39A05-1506-CR-633, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Jan. 22, 2016).

January 25, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Elements of Ohio residential burglary offense were not “substantially similar” to Indiana offense, and therefore did not establish serious violent felon (SVF) status.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 158
  • Page 159
  • Page 160
  • Page 161
  • Page 162
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 328
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs