• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Jason Hansbrough v. State, No. 29A04-1508-CR-1121, ___ N.E.3d ___, (Ind. Ct. App. Jan. 29, 2016).

February 2, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Dog sniff did not prolong Defendant’s traffic stop in violation of his constitutional rights.

Ronald L. Sanford, Jr. v. State, No. 49A05-1506-PC-485, ___ N.E.3d ___, (Ind. Ct. App. Jan. 29, 2016).

February 2, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Trial court was within its discretion to find that defendant was not “diligent” in pursuing belated appeal under P-C.R. 2, which is exclusive means to reinstate untimely appeal in criminal cases; relief under In re Adoption of O.R. (Ind. 2014) is limited to civil cases.

Willie Moore v. State, No. 49A02-1505-CR-321, ___ N.E.3d ___, (Ind. Ct. App. Jan. 29, 2016).

February 2, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, R. Pyle

Illinois residential burglary statute was “substantially similar” to Indiana burglary offense; despite not expressly containing a “breaking” element, Illinois caselaw infers such a requirement, and Illinois statute classifies it as a “forcible felony.”
Evidence was insufficient to support “bodily injury” element of resisting law enforcement as a Level 6 felony; fact that officer was injured while chasing defendant on foot established only contributing, not proximate, causation.

Kimberly Y. Morgan v. State, No. 34A05-1509-CR-1323, ___ N.E.3d ___, (Ind. Ct. App. Jan. 29, 2016).

February 2, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

Amount of restitution awarded to embezzlement victim was abuse of discretion; award included sums an audit revealed were missing but were not shown to be connected to defendant’s conduct, and expenditures to determine the amount of loss.

Slaybaugh v. State, No. 79S02-1601-CR-28, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind., Jan. 20, 2016).

January 25, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Fact that juror was Facebook “friends” with relatives of the victim did not establish juror misconduct, when juror testified that she did not know them personally or recognize them in court, and trial court found her testimony truthful.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 157
  • Page 158
  • Page 159
  • Page 160
  • Page 161
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 328
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs