• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Lash v. Kreigh, No. 22A-CC-1069, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 18, 2023).

January 23, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Foley

The proper calculation of damages based on the theory of quantum meruit used the plaintiff’s reasonable value of the work performed.

Brugh v. Milestone Contractors, LP, No. 22A-CT-845, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 11, 2023).

January 17, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Surviving spouse timely substituted herself as the real party in interest within the prescribed time limitations of the Indiana Wrongful Death Stature; the deadline was tolled by the Supreme Court’s orders regarding COVID-19.

Carmack v. State, No. 21S-LW-00471, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 12, 2023).

January 17, 2023 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

Sudden heat is characterized as anger, rage, resentment, or terror sufficient to obscure the reason of an ordinary person, preventing deliberation and premeditation, excluding malice, and rendering a person incapable of cool reflection. Here, the State carried its evidentiary burden in negating the mitigating factor and voluntary manslaughter requirement of “sudden heat,” and Defendant’s murder conviction and LWOP sentence.

In re K.V., LP, No. 22A-JC-987, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 13, 2023).

January 17, 2023 Filed Under: Civil, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

DCS was not required to make a reasonable effort to reunify children with foster parents when it was not in the children’s best interest. Foster parents were not entitled to intervene in CHINS case.

Easterday v. Everhart, No. 22A-DC-1510, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 6, 2023).

January 9, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

The trial court erred when it based the modification of child’s legal custody solely on religion; totally prohibiting father from discussing religion with child violates his First Amendment right to free speech.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 538
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe

Archive

Copyright © 2023 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs