• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

G. Slaughter

Kelly v. Ind. Bureau of Motor Vehicles, No. 25S-CT-158, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 23, 2025).

June 30, 2025 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, L. Rush

The Legislature has not created a private right of action for individuals to seek damages stemming from inaccurate BMV recordkeeping.

South Bend Comm. School Corp. v. Grabowski, No. 24S-CT-395, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 24, 2025).

June 30, 2025 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, Supreme

A Frampton claim, an exception to Indiana’s employment-at-will doctrine. requires the claimant to prove that her employer actually or constructively discharged her solely to deter her from seeking workers’ compensation benefits.

Peters v. Quakenbush, No. 25S-PL-152, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 19, 2025).

June 23, 2025 Filed Under: Civil, Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, D. Molter, G. Slaughter, Supreme

If a person “is required to register as a sex or violent offender in any jurisdiction,” that person must “register for the period required by the other jurisdiction or the period described in this section, whichever is longer.” I.C. § 11-8-8-19(f). This applies to a person residing, working, or attending school in Indiana even though that person committed no offense in the other jurisdiction that imposed the triggering registration requirement.

Diamond Quality, Inc. v. Dana Light Axle Products, LLC, No. 24S-CQ-265, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., Apr. 24, 2025).

April 28, 2025 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter

Absent a contractual or statutory duty, a property owner is always justified in excluding another from the owner’s premises.

JWB v. State, No. 24S-CR-288, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 24, 2025).

March 3, 2025 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, D. Molter, G. Slaughter

Even if the recent amendments to Ind. Code 31-30-1-4(d) and 31-37-1-2 (the juvenile jurisdiction statutes), are remedial, the General Assembly did not intend to apply them retroactively to pending cases.

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 20
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs