• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Wilson v. State, No. 25A-CR-1542, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 16, 2026).

February 16, 2026 Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

There must be additional indicia of erratic driving or unusual driving behavior before a reasonable suspicion arises that a motorist who is merely making jerky body movements is driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

Ewing v. State, No. 26S-CR-43, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 12, 2026).

February 16, 2026 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: D. Molter, G. Slaughter, Supreme

A prosecutor cannot seek a sanction for violating the rules of work release or probation that is different than the sanction sought in the revocation petition(s) that is (are) the subject of a final revocation hearing.

Pratcher v. State, No. 25A-CR-1656, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 11, 2026)(published order denying transfer).

February 16, 2026 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

When a defendant signs a plea agreement that leaves sentencing discretion to the trial court and contains a waiver of the right to appeal the sentence, the court should:
1. Explain that the defendant would ordinarily have the right to appeal their sentence, but the plea agreement contains a waiver limiting that right.
2. Read the appeal-waiver provision to the defendant.
3. Explain that the provision waives the defendant’s right to appeal the sentence to be imposed, except for:
• any issue that falls outside the scope of the waiver;
• a sentence that violates the plea agreement; or
• a sentence that is illegal because it falls outside the prescribed statutory range or is unconstitutional.
4. Confirm the defendant understands the consequences of the appeal-waiver provision before accepting the guilty plea.

Adkins, Jr. v. State, No. 24A-CR-2140, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 06, 2026).

February 9, 2026 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, L. Weissmann

The fact that legal hemp shares characteristics with illegal marijuana does not categorically disable law enforcement from relying on trained canine alerts that could indicate either substance.

Stokes v. State, No. 25A-CR-1740, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 30, 2026).

February 2, 2026 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Felix

The period of time allowed for testing under Indiana Code section 9-30-6-2 is “within three (3) hours after the law enforcement officer had probable cause to believe the person committed an offense under IC 9-30-5. Although the statute references probable cause, the State must prove that the chemical test was performed within three hours of the defendant’s last illegal operation of the vehicle.

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 597
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs