• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

In re the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of A.W., No. 24A-JT-3052, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 8, 2025).

December 8, 2025 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, M. DeBoer

In a termination of parental rights case, parents’ due process rights were violated by the trial court’s failure to compel DCS to disclose the names and contact information of child’s foster parents because that information could have led to the discovery of admissible evidence.

First Financial Bank, N.A. v. Vanhoose, No. 25A-CC-898, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 18, 2025).

November 24, 2025 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Foley

A garnishment order is a continuing lien. Employer is liable for the amount of garnished wages that were not remitted after employee was rehired.

Elzey v. State, No. 24S-CR-436, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 20, 2025).

November 24, 2025 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, M. Massa, Supreme

The Indiana State Public Defender must represent all indigent individuals who are confined in a penal facility in Indiana or committed to the Department of Correction due to a criminal conviction or delinquency adjudication. However, the Public Defender Statute, I.C. 33-40-1-2, and our post-conviction rules specifically Post-Conviction Rule 1(9)(a), still enable SPD to exercise its discretion in agreeing to representation.

Anderson v. State, No. 25S-CR-294, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 13, 2025).

November 17, 2025 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, Supreme

A sentence is illegal if it is outside the prescribed statutory range or is unconstitutional. An appeal challenging an illegal sentence cannot be waived.

Monroe Cty. Bd. of Zoning Appeals v. Bedford Recycling, Inc., No. 25S-MI-293, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 13, 2025).

November 17, 2025 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, D. Molter, Supreme

The Board of Zoning Appeals does not have statutory, inherent, or common law authority to reconsider its final order.

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 595
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs