“Indiana’s right of publicity statute contains an exception for material with newsworthy value that includes online fantasy sports operators’ use of college players’ names, pictures, and statistics for online fantasy contests.”
Supreme
B.T.E. v. State, No. 36S05-1711-JV-711, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 11, 2018).
The defendant’s planning, solicitations, bomb research, drawings depicting the target classroom, and death note together justify the trial court’s conclusion that his affirmative conduct amounts to a substantial step toward the commission of aggravated battery.
Wamsley v. Tree City Village, No. 18S-CT-502, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 11, 2018).
Trial Rule 60(B)(1) only requires “slight evidence of excusable neglect” to set aside a default judgment.
M.D. v. State, No. 18S-CR-488, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 3, 2018).
A person in police custody is not entitled to advisement of rights under Pirtle prior to police obtaining consent to conduct a Drug Recognition Exam (“DRE”).
Wright v. State, No. 18S-CR-00166, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 4, 2018).
The trial court properly admitted defendant’s statements to police after an illegal search as the Court grafted the attenuation doctrine onto our Article 1, Section 11 jurisprudence as a natural limit to the exclusionary rule.