• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

Weisheit v. State, No. 10S00-1507-PD-413, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 7, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: G. Slaughter, L. Rush, S. David, Supreme

Defendant’s conviction of the murders of two children, arson, death penalty sentence affirmed; finding that although mistakes were made by trial and appellate counsel most of them did not rise to the level of deficient performance under the Strickland decision, and defendant in any case failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced.

Campbell Hausfeld/Scott Fetzer Co. v. Johnson, No. 18S-CT-548, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 1, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Misuse serves as a complete bar to recovery in a products liability action because of the inclusion of comparative fault principles in the Indiana Products Liability Act.

Gittings v. Deal, No. 18S-TR-231, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 2, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Trust claims are subject to statutes of limitations to the extent they seek affirmative relief, but do not prevent the request for court approval of the property transfers.

Daniels v. FanDuel, Inc., No. 18S-CQ-00134, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 24, 2018).

October 29, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

“Indiana’s right of publicity statute contains an exception for material with newsworthy value that includes online fantasy sports operators’ use of college players’ names, pictures, and statistics for online fantasy contests.”

B.T.E. v. State, No. 36S05-1711-JV-711, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 11, 2018).

October 15, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal, Juvenile Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

The defendant’s planning, solicitations, bomb research, drawings depicting the target classroom, and death note together justify the trial court’s conclusion that his affirmative conduct amounts to a substantial step toward the commission of aggravated battery.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 59
  • Page 60
  • Page 61
  • Page 62
  • Page 63
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 177
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs