Administrative Rule 9 does not require petitioner present evidence of actual or imminent harm from the publication of a gender change petition. To obtain a change to the gender marker on his birth certificate, petitioner must only show the request was made in good faith and not for a fraudulent or unlawful purpose.
E. Najam
Anderson v. State, No. 19A-CR-2003, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 30, 2020).
A reviewing court reviews plea agreements de novo and typographical errors in the agreement will be interpreted in a manner to give effect to the intent of the parties based on the agreement as a whole.
Peele v. State, No. 19A-CR-1160, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 20, 2019).
Trial court erred in granting state’s continuance motion filed thirteen days before the speedy trial date, which was the same day it requested lab test results from the State Police Laboratory.
Campbell v. Eary, No. 19A-MI-6, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 15, 2019).
A grandparent visitation order does not survive the subsequent marriage of the natural parents of a child born out of wedlock.
Wallen v. Hossler, No. 19A-CT-40, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 23, 2019).
Plaintiff may pursue excess damages from the Patient’s Compensation Fund either after a jury trial or after he has entered into a settlement agreement; nothing in the Medical Malpractice Act requires plaintiff to accept doctor’s offer to settle his liability.