• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Cox v. State, No. 27A02-1412-CR-599, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 7, 2015).

July 9, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Amelioration doctrine did not apply to defendant’s sentence because the legislature clearly stated in Ind. Code 1-1-5.5-21(b) that it did not intend the amelioration doctrine to apply.

In re I.J., No. 57A03-1501-AD-28, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 8, 2015).

July 9, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. May, M. Robb

The trial court erred in denying a possible father’s (third-party) request for genetic testing for a child born to a married couple who placed the newborn for adoption.

Johnson v. United States, No. 13-7120, ___ U.S. ___ (June 26, 2015).

July 2, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: A. Kennedy, A. Scalia, C. Thomas, S. Alito, SCOTUS

Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA)’s definition of “violent felony” is unconstitutionally vague as to its residual clause, which covers any felony that “involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another”; clause leaves uncertainty about how to estimate the risk posed by a crime or how much risk it takes for a crime to qualify as a violent felony. (Overruling James v. United States, 550 U.S. 192 (2007) and Sykes v. United States, 564 U.S. 1 (2011).)

Dada v. State, ___ N.E.3d ___, No. 53A01-1501-CR-33 (Ind. Ct. App. June 26, 2015).

July 2, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Court erred in denying expungement to misdemeanant; she was entitled to expungement even though “she had been summonsed rather than arrested” for her offense.

Satterfield v. State, No. 63S00-1401-LW-306, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. June 26, 2015).

July 2, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Court did not abuse its discretion in admitting officer’s lay-witness testimony that an allegedly mentally ill defendant was “evasive” during police questioning.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 336
  • Page 337
  • Page 338
  • Page 339
  • Page 340
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 605
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs