• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Hernandez v. State, No. 49S02-1511-CR-644, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Nov. 10, 2015).

November 16, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

At trial for carrying a handgun without a license, defendant presented some evidence to support defense of necessity; trial court therefore erred in refusing to give the instruction.

Darringer v. State, No. 32A01-1503-CR-86, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Nov. 13, 2015).

November 16, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Traffic stop was based on unreasonable mistake of law, thus requiring suppression of evidence and reversal of OWI conviction; deputy’s belief in mid-2014 that temporary license plate could not be displayed in back window was unreasonable in view of 2013 amendment of I.C. § 9-32-6-11 expressly permitting such displays.

Trammell v. State, No. 24A01-1502-CR-51, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Nov. 13, 2015).

November 16, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Defendant’s probation was improperly revoked, because State failed to prove that the alleged violation occurred during the probationary period; Court of Appeals would not consider matters outside the record included in the State’s Appendix purporting to show the dates defendant was on probation.

Pittman v. State, No. 49A05-1504-CR-137, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2015).

November 9, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Attempted stalking, unlike the completed crime, does not require proof that the defendant’s conduct “actually causes the victim to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, or threatened.”

Townsend v. State, No. 02A03-1503-CR-90, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2015).

November 9, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Jury’s rejection of insanity defense was not contrary to law, when there was evidence that defendant’s mental state was due to voluntary intoxication rather than mental disease or defect.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 158
  • Go to page 159
  • Go to page 160
  • Go to page 161
  • Go to page 162
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 323
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs