• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Blackmon v. State, No. 48A02-1505-CR-270, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Dec. 15, 2015).

December 21, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Trial court did not err in denying Batson challenge, even though one of the State’s two race-neutral reasons for striking prospective juror was suspect and trial court did not specify which reason it found credible; under the “dual-motive” approach, the record showed the State would have exercised the strike even without the suspect reason.

Key v. State, No. 02A04-1507-MI-854, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Dec. 17, 2015).

December 21, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Trial court erred in denying expungement without a hearing after the State objected to the petition; expungement statute requires a hearing when the State objects, and expungement could not be summarily denied because defendant was entitled to mandatory expungement of one of his convictions.

Wolpert v. State, No. 01A02-1506-CR-561, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2015).

December 21, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

“Certificate of Inspection and Compliance of Breath Test Instrument” issued within prior 180 days was sufficient foundation for admissibility of breath test results.

Garcia v. State, No. 45A03-1503-CR-86, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2015).

December 21, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, M. May

Probable-cause affidavit’s statement that crime victim paid $3,600 for counterfeit coins was insufficient to support restitution order in that amount; facts presented in probable cause affidavits pose a risk of unreliability that the hearsay rule is designed to protect against.

Lovett v. State, No. 20A04-1506-MI-591, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Dec. 11, 2015).

December 14, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker, M. Barnes

Indiana’s Sex Offender Registration Act did not violate ex post facto clause of the Indiana Constitution as applied to defendant. SORA did not exist at the time of defendant’s 1991 conviction in Washington, but Washington law imposed similar registration requirements; thus, applying SORA after defendant moved here in 2003 imposed no new punishment.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 155
  • Go to page 156
  • Go to page 157
  • Go to page 158
  • Go to page 159
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 323
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs