A trial court judge is not required to recuse from a case solely because counsel for one of the parties served as a professional reference.
Supreme
Jones v. State, No. 84S05-1712-CR-741, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind.,Dec. 19, 2017).
Abandonment is an allowable defense for both attempted robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery, but it must be voluntary and occur after the “prohibited conduct” and before the “underlying crime” has been committed or becomes inevitable.
Johnson v. State, No. 32S05-1707-CR-469, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 21, 2017).
The state must prove that each of the three prior unrelated felony convictions meet the ten-year requirement in order to have a person sentenced as a habitual offender under Ind. Code 35-50-2-8(d).
Calvin v. State, No. 02S03-1709-CR-611 , __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 21, 2017).
Despite an argument that it leads to an absurd result, a level 4 burglary conviction could not be enhanced with a habitual-offender finding because defendant’s two prior out-of-state convictions must be treated as Level 6 felonies under Ind. Code 35-50-2-8(b).
Bellwether Properties, LLC v. Duke Energy Indiana, Inc., No. 53S04-1703-CT-121, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 20, 2017).
Because the complaint does not establish that the statute of limitations had already run when the complaint was filed, Defendant’s T.R. 12(B)(6) motion shouldn’t have been granted.