• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

Sims v. Pappas, No. 45S03-1701-CT-26, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 11, 2017).

May 15, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

Prior alcohol-related driving convictions can be introduced into evidence for the issue of punitive damages and the remoteness of a prior offense does not affect the admissibility of the evidence.

Leonard v. State, No. 71S00-1509-LW-539, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 2, 2017).

May 9, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

In the Richmond Hill explosion murder case, resulting in trial court imposition of two consecutive life without parole sentences, the evidence was sufficient; the State proved the intentional burning aggravator beyond a reasonable doubt; recorded phone calls from prison between defendant and special agent were properly admitted; and, Indiana’s life without parole statute is constitutional.

Zanders v. State, No. 15S01-1611-CR-571, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 4, 2017).

May 9, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, S. David, Supreme

Under the third-party doctrine, police are not required to obtain a search warrant to get historical cell-site location information from a cell phone provider.

Humphrey v. State, No. 48S02-1609-PC-480, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 5, 2017).

May 9, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Massa, R. Rucker, Supreme

Post-conviction relief due to ineffective assistance of counsel was granted fifteen years after murder conviction affirmed on appeal and not barred by the doctrine of laches.

Escamilla v. Shiel Sexton Co., Inc., No. 54S01-1610-CT-546, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 4, 2017).

May 8, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Unauthorized immigrants can pursue claims for decreased earning capacity damages. Unauthorized immigration status is admissible only if the evidence’s proponent shows by a preponderance of evidence that the plaintiff will be deported.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 66
  • Go to page 67
  • Go to page 68
  • Go to page 69
  • Go to page 70
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 170
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs