The Supreme Court’s emergency orders, issued because of COVID, did not toll the accrual of post-judgment interest.
R. Altice
Page v. State, 21A-CR-90, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 6, 2021).
The “valid prescription” requirement is intended to assure the prescription was not obtained by fraud, misrepresentation, or deceit and thus, an expired prescription is still a “valid prescription” under Ind. Code § 35-48-4-6(a).
Harvey v. Keyed In Property Management, LLC, No. 20A-SC-1459, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App, Feb. 26, 2021).
Under Small Claims Rule 8(c), an LLC using a full-time employee to represent it can allege damages above $1,500 and waive net damages in excess of the jurisdictional limit; setoffs and counterclaims were not subtracted from the jurisdictional limit.
Smith v. State, 20A-CR-1014, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 20, 2021).
In a trial in absentia, it is not error for the trial court to inform the jury that defendant was personally notified of the trial date.
Temme v. State, 20A-CR-275, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 20, 2020).
Because Indiana has a statutory scheme for the award of credit time, the equitable, common law doctrine of “credit for time erroneously at liberty,” does not apply.