• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

L. Rush

Perry County v. Huck, No. 24S-PL-297, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 22, 2025).

July 28, 2025 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, L. Rush, M. Massa, Supreme

Local elected officials may be designated as part-time employees, which permits the county to exclude them from group health insurance.

State v. B.H., No. 25S-JV-47, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jun. 30, 2025)

July 7, 2025 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Even when Ind. Code § 35-38-4-2 authorizes the State to seek an appeal, the State must still comply with the appellate rules. This includes complying with the thirty-day time limit to file a notice of appeal when, following the entry of a final judgment, a trial court rules on a timely motion to correct error.

Kelly v. Ind. Bureau of Motor Vehicles, No. 25S-CT-158, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 23, 2025).

June 30, 2025 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, L. Rush

The Legislature has not created a private right of action for individuals to seek damages stemming from inaccurate BMV recordkeeping.

In re E.K., No. 24S-JC-300, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 19, 2025).

June 23, 2025 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Courts can amend a CHINS petition on a party’s request to include CHINS allegations not pled by DCS when doing so serves the child’s best interests and does not prejudice the child’s rights. The best practice is for the court and counsel on all sides to determine at the earliest opportunity whether any party might request adjudication under an alternative CHINS category.

JQR v. State, No. 24S-JV-298, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 12, 2025).

March 18, 2025 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Trial court abused its discretion by admitting a juvenile’s statements into evidence without a valid waiver of right. An adverse interest may arise if the evidence shows an adult waives the juvenile’s rights but stands to personally benefit from the waiver to the child’s detriment.

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 28
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs