After entering judgment, pursuant to Trial Rule 59, a trial court cannot set aside the judgment without stating specific reasons.
D. Molter
Blattert, Jr. v. State, No. 21A-CR-1082, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 15, 2022).
Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act does not apply to child abuse; protecting children from physical abuse is a compelling governmental interest and prosecution is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest. To that end, Indiana offers the parental privilege as a defense to battery and similar crimes rather than completely banning the practice of corporal punishments. This accommodates religious practices which require reasonable corporal punishment.
State v. Pemberton, No. 21A-CR-668, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 31, 2022).
Absent specific exceptions outlined by our legislature in other statutes, acts that would be criminal offenses if committed by adults are defined by Indiana law as delinquent acts when committed by individuals under age eighteen, and Indiana law gives exclusive jurisdiction of delinquency proceedings to juvenile courts.
Estate of Bichler v. Bichler, No. 21A-CT-752__ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App, Feb. 1, 2022).
Trial court improperly dismissed case when defendant died during pendency of the case and her personal representatives were not substituted.