• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Ping v. Inman, No. 23A-CT-251, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 31, 2024).

February 5, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

A trial court should hold an evidentiary hearing on the issue of juror misconduct if there is a possibility of juror bias.

In re N.E., No. 23A-JC-996, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 31, 2024).

February 5, 2024 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

A litigant’s failure to appear at a hearing should be addressed using the indirect contempt procedure which requires a rule to show cause and a hearing. The trial court erred by relying upon information obtained from the drug testing facility by its court reporter without her testimony under oath.

State v. Woodworth, No. 22A-CR-2557, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 23, 2024).

January 29, 2024 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

When a trial court overturns a jury’s verdict, Trial Rule 59(J) requires special findings of fact upon each material issue or element of the claim or defense upon which a new trial is granted. When a court grants a new trial without making specific findings, the remedy on appeal is to reinstate the jury verdict.

Konkle v. State, No. 23A-CR-783, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 24, 2024).

January 29, 2024 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, N. Vaidik

The eggshell-skull doctrine does not apply in cases of murder or voluntary manslaughter. The relevant statutes require that the defendant either must intend to kill the victim or know that his actions will likely result in the victim’s death, which is inconsistent with the proposition that you take your victim as you find them.

In re Visitation of C.B., No. 23A-MI-1586, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 24, 2024).

January 29, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

The Grandparents Visitation Act does not preclude a grandparent from seeking visitation with a child where the custodian of the child is the grandparent’s child.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 24
  • Page 25
  • Page 26
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 408
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs