• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Cleveland Range, LLC v. Lincoln Fort Wayne Assoc., LLC, No. 02A05-1503-PL-96, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 4, 2015).

September 4, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

T.R. 27 petition to depose witnesses before the initiation of litigation was within the trial court’s discretion, as there was evidence supporting expectations it might be a party to a suit, it seeks to preserve specifically identified facts probative to a key issue, and declining to permit the depositions could result in a failure or delay of justice based on the age of the witnesses.

Ryan v. State, No. 49A02-1501-CR-2, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 26, 2015).

August 28, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Under Ind. Code § 35-33-9-5(c) and App. R. 18, defendants cannot earn credit time while released on appeal bond, regardless of allegedly onerous nature of bond conditions; instead, reasonableness of conditions must be challenged immediately by motion to reconsider or appeal under App. R. 18.

Wharton v. State, No. 49A02-1502-CR-85, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 26, 2015).

August 28, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

“Open plea” of guilty to multiple OWI charges did not waive defendant’s double-jeopardy challenge to those convictions.

Curtis v. State, No. 18A02-1501-CR-59, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 26, 2015).

August 28, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Robbing a pharmacist of painkillers, robbing a pharmacy technician of her car keys, then stealing the technician’s car parked outside the pharmacy, were separate and distinct criminal acts and did not amount to a “single larceny.”

Gross v. State, No. 41A01-1411-CR-467, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 14, 2015).

August 21, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb, P. Mathias

Due process required dismissal of charges against incompetent defendant, when he had been certified unlikely to be restored to competence and had been committed for longer than his maximum possible sentence less credit time.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 220
  • Go to page 221
  • Go to page 222
  • Go to page 223
  • Go to page 224
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 405
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs