• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

In re D.B., No. 49A02-1501-JC-48, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 2, 2015).

September 4, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown, J. Baker

Child’s absent, out-of-state father should be presumed to be a fit and capable parent unless the state proves otherwise.

Cleveland Range, LLC v. Lincoln Fort Wayne Assoc., LLC, No. 02A05-1503-PL-96, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 4, 2015).

September 4, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

T.R. 27 petition to depose witnesses before the initiation of litigation was within the trial court’s discretion, as there was evidence supporting expectations it might be a party to a suit, it seeks to preserve specifically identified facts probative to a key issue, and declining to permit the depositions could result in a failure or delay of justice based on the age of the witnesses.

Ryan v. State, No. 49A02-1501-CR-2, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 26, 2015).

August 28, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Under Ind. Code § 35-33-9-5(c) and App. R. 18, defendants cannot earn credit time while released on appeal bond, regardless of allegedly onerous nature of bond conditions; instead, reasonableness of conditions must be challenged immediately by motion to reconsider or appeal under App. R. 18.

Wharton v. State, No. 49A02-1502-CR-85, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 26, 2015).

August 28, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

“Open plea” of guilty to multiple OWI charges did not waive defendant’s double-jeopardy challenge to those convictions.

Curtis v. State, No. 18A02-1501-CR-59, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 26, 2015).

August 28, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Robbing a pharmacist of painkillers, robbing a pharmacy technician of her car keys, then stealing the technician’s car parked outside the pharmacy, were separate and distinct criminal acts and did not amount to a “single larceny.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 221
  • Go to page 222
  • Go to page 223
  • Go to page 224
  • Go to page 225
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 407
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs