• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Burnell v. State, No. 29A02-1412-CR-849, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 24, 2015).

September 28, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown, R. Pyle, T. Crone

OWI suspect’s drivers license was properly suspended under Implied Consent Law; walking away from officer and disregarding request to stop constituted refusal to submit to chemical test, even though her words had expressed reluctant agreement to be tested.

In re Paternity of Pickett, No. 29A02-1501-JP-9, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App, Sept. 23, 2015).

September 28, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Trial court erred in ordering father to contribute to child’s college expenses based on the cost of a private university rather than a public university; the private university did not offer a special curriculum and child did not discuss her decisionmaking process with her father.

Boyer Construction Group Corp. v. Walker Construction Co., Inc., No. 45A03-1502-PL-66, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App, Sept. 24, 2015).

September 28, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Even after a trial court has entered a judgment, parties can still make a new filing for attorney fees.

Strunk v. State, No. 47A01-1411-CR-487, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 15, 2015).

September 21, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Minor sex-abuse victim properly authenticated Facebook message from defendant to her; she was familiar with appearance of defendant’s Facebook page and had previously communicated with him through Facebook messages.

Bradley v. State, No. 49A05-1404-CR-181, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 16, 2015).

September 21, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Warrantless entry of home was proper under federal and state constitutions, because occupant who answered the door had apparent authority to consent to the entry. Protective sweep of kitchen after consensual entry was proper under federal and state constitutions (declining to follow Cudworth v. State, 818 N.E.2d 133 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004)). Convictions for both A-felony cocaine dealing and C-felony possessing cocaine and a firearm violated double jeopardy, because charging information did not differentiate between sources of cocaine: small quantity found in home, or large quantity found in defendant’s pocket.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 218
  • Go to page 219
  • Go to page 220
  • Go to page 221
  • Go to page 222
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 407
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs