• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Ogburn v. State, No. 8A01-1509-CR-1546, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., April 18, 2016).

April 18, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Smell of burnt marijuana, observed during exigent-circumstance entry into apartment, did not provide probable cause for search warrant when officer did not explain why he concluded smell was not from neighboring apartment; and seizure of key fob for vehicle where large bundles of marijuana were found exceeded scope of warrant’s authorization for “indicia of occupancy, residency or ownership.” State failed to prove K-9 sniff of vehicle would have been conducted independent of the tainted evidence. Because bundles of marijuana were poisoned fruit and should have been suppressed, conviction was reversed.

Daugherty v. State, No. 89A01-1510-PC-1532, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind., Apr. 5, 2016).

April 11, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Consecutive sentences for two counts of SVF in possession of a firearm did not constitute a double enhancement,; but they exceeded the statutory cap for a “single episode of criminal conduct.”

Community Health Network v. Bails, No. 49A05-1512-PL-2059, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 7, 2016).

April 11, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

Absent fraud, an agreed judgment is not appealable.

Fisher v. State, No. 20A03-1509-CR-1373, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 31, 2016).

April 4, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Restitution order was proper, despite plea agreement’s silence about restitution; agreement implicitly incorporated I.C. § 35-48-4-17, which mandates restitution in methamphetamine cleanup cases.

Escamilla v. Shiel Sexton Co., Inc., No. 54A01-1506-CT-602, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 31, 2016).

April 4, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker, M. May

Plaintiff’s status as an undocumented immigrant is relevant to a claim of lost earning capacity.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 202
  • Page 203
  • Page 204
  • Page 205
  • Page 206
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 408
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs