• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

In re D.W., No. 45A03-1507-JC-842, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 24, 2016).

March 24, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Trial court’s order denying mother’s motion to modify permanency plan was not a final judgment, and so the Court of Appeals lacked subject matter jurisdiction over appeal.

ESPN, Inc. v. University of Notre Dame Security Police Dept., No. 71A05-1505-MI-381, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 15, 2016).

March 21, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

Private university’s police department qualified as a “public agency” under the Indiana Access to Public Records Act’s definition and so is required to provide access to its public records not exempted by the Act.

Grayson v. State, No. 49A05-1505-CR-350, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 8, 2016).

March 14, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Anonymous tip of individual in silver or gray car waving a gun in apartment parking lot provided reasonable suspicion for investigatory stop of defendant, who was in the only occupied silver car in the parking lot; officer’s observations then gave probable cause for search.

Lowden v. State, No. 49A02-1503-CR-170, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 10, 2016).

March 14, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

For purposes of aggravated battery, “substantial risk of death or … protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member or organ” is not a material element of the offense, but rather a result to which mens rea is inapplicable.

Williams v. State, No. 29A02-1506-CR-528, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 10, 2016).

March 14, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

Defendant entered an “open plea,” despite plea agreement’s mistaken recitation that it was not, because trial court retained discretion over placement of the sentence. Defendant therefore did not waive right to appeal sentence.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 203
  • Page 204
  • Page 205
  • Page 206
  • Page 207
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 408
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs