• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Tillett v. State, No. 24A-CR-1413, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 28, 2025).

March 31, 2025 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown, E. Tavitas, R. Altice

A defendant, charged with a felony, must file a notice of intent to raise an insanity defense no later than 20 days before omnibus date. However, in the interest of justice and upon a showing of good cause, a trial court may permit the filing to be made at any time before commencement of the trial.

In re W.H., No. 24A-JC-2241, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 7, 2025).

March 11, 2025 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Because the court was required to order preparation of a predispositional report in a CHINS case, and the report had to be provided to the parties prior to the dispositional hearing, the report did not need to be admitted into evidence to be part of the record that the juvenile court could consider.

McGee v. State, No. 24A-CR-1312, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 19, 2025).

February 24, 2025 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

The Second Amendment does not protect machine guns because they are dangerous and unusual.

Flowers v. State, No. 24A-CR-1219, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 28, 2025).

February 3, 2025 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

The abuse of discretion standard of review applies to the review of trial court bond forfeiture rulings.

Graff v. State, No. 23A-CR-2546, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 28, 2025).

February 3, 2025 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Where a suspect has not been arrested, arraigned or indicted, a polygraph examination and post-testing interrogation do not constitute critical stages upon which the right to counsel attaches. Evidence that a polygraph examination directly preceded a confession, occurred in the exact same room, and involved the same officer to which the confession was given may be admissible. Consistent with Indiana Rule of Evidence 106, the preliminaries to a polygraph examination, the examination itself, and the subsequent police interview are all part of one recorded statement, and fairness dictates that neither party should be able to decide that the jury will hear only the parts of the statement it deems favorable to its case.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 399
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs