Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services
A trial court’s order on a repetitive motion or a motion to reconsider is an “other interlocutory order” under App. Rule 14(B).
The Court also creates a legal framework for determining whether good cause exists to limit or prohibit the deposition of a high-ranking official.
Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme
Because plaintiffs allege no injury, they have no standing to challenge city ordinance.
Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford
Medical payments coverage does not reduce an uninsured/underinsured motorist (“UIM”) coverage obligation.
Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, L. Weissmann
A trial court must expressly find, on the record, that a civil-commitment respondent is capable of knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waiving the right to counsel before accepting the respondent’s waiver of that right.
Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas
Pursuant to the plain language of Ind. Code § 9-30-5-2, the level of an intoxicant in the defendant’s blood, standing alone, is insufficient to establish impairment.
Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.