• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Holcomb v. Bray, No. 21S-PL-518, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 3, 2022).

June 6, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

The Governor is not procedurally barred from seeking declaratory relief on the constitutionality of HEA-1123; the Court holds HEA-1123 is unconstitutional.

Galloway, Jr. v. State, No. 21A-CR-1127, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 24, 2022).

May 31, 2022 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, R. Altice

A party who has rendered a witness unavailable for cross-examination through a criminal act may not object to the introduction of hearsay statements by the witness on confrontation grounds.

Miller v. Patel, No. 21A-CT-2500, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 24, 2022).

May 31, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Plaintiff did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue of his criminal responsibility in the criminal case because he entered a plea agreement. It would be otherwise unfair to apply collateral estoppel to preclude plaintiff from attempting to rebut the inference of his sanity established by his plea of guilty but mentally ill.

Mitchell v. State, No. 21A-CR-2722, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 25, 2022).

May 31, 2022 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

To be convicted of battery by means of a deadly weapon, the statute requires only that the weapon is readily capable of causing serious bodily injury in the manner in which it was used, could be used, or was intended to be used; there is no requirement that the weapon caused such injury.

B.A. v. D.D., No. 22A-AD-147, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 26, 2022).

May 31, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Evidence that a man is not a child’s biological father, without more, is not dispositive of whether he is the child’s legal father or obviate the need for his consent to an adoption.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 66
  • Go to page 67
  • Go to page 68
  • Go to page 69
  • Go to page 70
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs