• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Amick v. State, No. 19A-CR-27, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 6, 2019).

June 10, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

A court may place a person on home detention as part of a community corrections program and require the payment of a home detention fee, which must be set by the court.

In re Unsupervised Estate of Orlando C. Lewis, Jr., No. 18S-EU-507, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 3, 2019).

June 10, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

Trial court properly exercised its discretion to reconsider its initial appointment of the special administrator of an estate. Though not required by statute or trial rule, courts should nevertheless give notice and hold a hearing before appointing a special administrator or rescinding such an appointment.

O’Bryant v. Adams, No. 18S-PL-584, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 4, 2019).

June 10, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

A valid forum-selection clause, in which the parties agree by contract to litigate their disputes in a specific forum, does not deprive a trial court of personal jurisdiction over parties that would otherwise be subject to the court’s jurisdiction.

Town of Brownsburg, Ind. v. Fight Against Brownsburg Annexation, No. 19S-PL-342, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 5, 2019).

June 10, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

A trial court hearing a remonstrance proceeding on judicial review must consider the evidence submitted by both the municipality and the remonstrators, and need not defer to either the municipality’s own evidence supporting the annexation or its determination that it met the statutory requirements.

In re Paternity of Bonilla, No. 18A-JP-2488, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 5, 2019).

June 10, 2019 Filed Under: Civil, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Trial court had the authority and duty to make requisite findings on special immigrant juvenile status in accordance with 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(27)(J).

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 172
  • Page 173
  • Page 174
  • Page 175
  • Page 176
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 601
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs