• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

McAnalley v. State, No. 18A-CR-1099, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 18, 2019).

October 21, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, C. Darden

Defendant is permitted to stipulate to his status as a felon in a trial for unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon. When a passenger in an automobile is arrested on a warrant, search of the passenger compartment is permissible under both the Indiana and federal constitutions, based on suspicious behavior and/or admission by the passenger of ownership of contraband in the passenger side of the vehicle.

Weikart v. Whitko Comm. School Corp., No. 19A-CT-1224, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 17, 2019).

October 21, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker, T. Crone

Trial court properly dismissed case for failure to state a claim; police officer did not have a special duty to plaintiff to protect her activities from public disclosure.

Falls v. State, No. 19S-CR-557, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 8, 2019).

October 15, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

A charge of stalking may be supported by conduct that is continuous in nature, even if it is a single episode.

State v. McFarland, No. 18A-CR-2408, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 10, 2019

October 15, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

Trial court properly denied the State’s motion to amend the habitual offender charging information because it would prejudice defendant’s substantial rights and because it was not supported by good cause.

Martin v. State, No. 19A-CR-183, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 11, 2019).

October 15, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, R. Altice

Defendant was improperly sentenced for a crime – Level 3 Felony robbery – for which he had not been convicted because the State did not allege the use of a deadly weapon as an enhancement of the robbery offense, and the jury was never instructed on that crime.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 156
  • Go to page 157
  • Go to page 158
  • Go to page 159
  • Go to page 160
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 601
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs