• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

I.G. v. State, No. 21A-JV-479, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 10, 2021).

September 13, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

The odor of marijuana, by itself, is not enough to establish probable cause to arrest the occupants of a vehicle.

Bunnell v. State, 21S-CR-139, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Sep. 2, 2021).

September 7, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, M. Massa, Supreme

An officer who affirms that they detect the odor of raw marijuana based on their training and experience may establish probable cause without providing further details on their qualifications to recognize said odor.

Renner v. Shepard-Bazant, No. 21S-CT-138, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 31, 2021).

September 7, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, Supreme

In a bench trial, a party arguing for a mitigation-of-damages jury instruction “need only point to some evidence in the record that when viewed most favorably [to the party] would suffice for a reasonable juror to decide the issue in the party’s favor.”

Blackford v. Welborn Clinic, No. 21S-CT-85, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 31, 2021).

September 7, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, Supreme

The Indiana Business Trust Act’s limitation period is a statute of repose and fraudulent concealment may not extend the time in which to file a claim.

State v. Barnett, No. 20A-CR-2144, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 25, 2021).

August 30, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by giving preclusive effect to the Marion County Probate Court’s 2012 age-change order and the March 7, 2017, order reaffirming same, thus preventing the State from relitigating the alleged victim’s age; and the trial court did not err in dismissing multiple counts against the defendants because the charges were filed outside of the five-year statute of limitations period.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 102
  • Go to page 103
  • Go to page 104
  • Go to page 105
  • Go to page 106
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 601
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs