• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Dowell v. State, No. 09A05-1201-CR-36, __ N.E.2d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 27, 2012).

August 31, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Jury Rules’ “leeway” for assisting a deliberating jury does not permit giving a supplemental instruction on accomplice liability by means of a note to jurors, instead of rereading all instructions in open court.

Bean v. State, No. 91A02-1109-CR-906, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 22, 2012).

August 23, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Among factors leading to conclusion there was Miranda custody was the giving of Miranda rights, defendant’s invocation of those rights, and police failure to comply with them, notwithstanding continued police assurances during lengthy questioning that defendant was free to leave whenever he wished.

Iltzsch v. State, No. 49A02-1112-CR-1164, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 14, 2012).

August 17, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey, P. Mathias

Reverses restitution order because it rested solely upon victim’s unsupported assertions of loss as related to probation officer and placed in PSI, and holds State may not have a new restitution hearing to present evidence sufficient to support a restitution award.

Gulzar v. State, No. 20A03-1202-PC-88, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 7, 2012).

August 9, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Even assuming, had he been advised of deportation consequences, that defendant would not have pled guilty due to the “special circumstances” that deportation would have uprooted his family, the very strong evidence of his guilt made harmless counsel’s failure to advise him that his theft plea bargain would result in automatic deportation.

Dye v. State, No. 20S04-1201-CR-5, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., July 31, 2012).

August 3, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, F. Sullivan, M. Massa, Supreme

Habitual offender enhancement may not be imposed on conviction of possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 244
  • Page 245
  • Page 246
  • Page 247
  • Page 248
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 330
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs