Among factors leading to conclusion there was Miranda custody was the giving of Miranda rights, defendant’s invocation of those rights, and police failure to comply with them, notwithstanding continued police assurances during lengthy questioning that defendant was free to leave whenever he wished.
Criminal
Iltzsch v. State, No. 49A02-1112-CR-1164, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 14, 2012).
Reverses restitution order because it rested solely upon victim’s unsupported assertions of loss as related to probation officer and placed in PSI, and holds State may not have a new restitution hearing to present evidence sufficient to support a restitution award.
Gulzar v. State, No. 20A03-1202-PC-88, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 7, 2012).
Even assuming, had he been advised of deportation consequences, that defendant would not have pled guilty due to the “special circumstances” that deportation would have uprooted his family, the very strong evidence of his guilt made harmless counsel’s failure to advise him that his theft plea bargain would result in automatic deportation.
Dye v. State, No. 20S04-1201-CR-5, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., July 31, 2012).
Habitual offender enhancement may not be imposed on conviction of possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon.
Castillo v. State, No. 45S00-1102-LW-110, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., July 31, 2012).
When evidence showed defendant’s boyfriend killed her child and that she was an accomplice to the murder, the life without parole sentence for her was inappropriate; revises murder sentence to 65 years.