• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Grayson v. State, No. 49A05-1505-CR-350, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 8, 2016).

March 14, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Anonymous tip of individual in silver or gray car waving a gun in apartment parking lot provided reasonable suspicion for investigatory stop of defendant, who was in the only occupied silver car in the parking lot; officer’s observations then gave probable cause for search.

Marshall v. State, No. 20A03-1507-MI-973, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 9, 2016).

March 14, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Barnes

Expungement was properly denied when, despite having no new convictions, petitioner had admitted in a pretrial diversion program to committing a new crime.

Lowden v. State, No. 49A02-1503-CR-170, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 10, 2016).

March 14, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

For purposes of aggravated battery, “substantial risk of death or … protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member or organ” is not a material element of the offense, but rather a result to which mens rea is inapplicable.

Williams v. State, No. 29A02-1506-CR-528, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 10, 2016).

March 14, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

Defendant entered an “open plea,” despite plea agreement’s mistaken recitation that it was not, because trial court retained discretion over placement of the sentence. Defendant therefore did not waive right to appeal sentence.

Blaize v. State, No. 26S00-1410-LW-771, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind., March 1, 2016).

March 7, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

Trial judge’s comments to jury, though perhaps ill-advised, did not vouch for the credibility of the State’s cell-phone tower evidence and undermine Defendant’s alibi defense.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 151
  • Go to page 152
  • Go to page 153
  • Go to page 154
  • Go to page 155
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 328
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs