• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Caetano v. Massachusetts, No. 14-10078, ___ U.S. ___ (March 21, 2016).

March 29, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, S. Alito, SCOTUS

Second Amendment protects possession of stun guns; right is not limited to arms in existence at the founding or weapons useful in warfare.

Mannix v. State, No. 49A04-1505-CR-294, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 23, 2016).

March 29, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik, T. Crone

Chemical test administered over three hours after accident is admissible, but deprives the State of the rebuttable presumption that the results reflect driver’s time-of-accident BAC.
Trial court could not rely solely on elements of one offense to impose greater-than-advisory sentence for the other.

Villaruel v. State, No. 71A03-1506-CR-544, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 23, 2016).

March 29, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Trial court failed to undertake Batson analysis when defense challenged State’s peremptory strike of Hispanic juror; convictions were therefore reversed and remanded for new trial.

Frink v. State, No. 73A05-1507-CR-761, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 24, 2016).

March 29, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Defendant, a former school corporation employee, was not entitled to dismissal of charge of trespassing on corporation property; state presented sufficient facts to disprove that merely having children living in in the school system gave her a “contractual interest” in the school property.

Wahl v. State, Nos. 29S04-1510-CR-605 and 29S04-1510-CR-606, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind., Mar. 15, 2016).

March 21, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, M. Massa, Supreme

Alternate juror interjecting himself into deliberations was presumptively prejudicial, and State failed to rebut the presumption; therefore, new trial was required.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 150
  • Go to page 151
  • Go to page 152
  • Go to page 153
  • Go to page 154
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 328
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs