• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

In re Termination of Parent-Child Relationship of S.K., No. 18A-JT-2200, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 13, 2019).

May 13, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Children’s statements made to therapist regarding whether the children were aware that father killed their mother and whether they understood that they could visit Father were not admissible hearsay under the medical diagnosis exception because children likely did not understand that they were making statements to the therapist for the purpose of diagnosis or treatment.

Robinson v. Robinson, No. 18A-EM-2742, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 13, 2019).

May 13, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam, J. Baker

A transfer on death deed beneficiary “takes the owner’s interest in the property at the death of the owner subject to all conveyances . . . made by the owner . . . during the owner’s lifetime.” If the property owner quitclaims property interest prior to death, then there is no interest in the property to transfer upon death via the transfer on death deed.

Civil Commitment of T.W. v. St. Vincent Hospital & Health Care Center, No. 19S-MH-264, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 30, 2019).

May 6, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Commissioner lacked authority to enter the commitment orders; the judge must review and sign each order.

Cavanaugh’s Sports Bar & Eatery, Ltd. v. Porterfield, No. 18A-CT-1814, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 30, 2019).

May 6, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Bar failed to establish as a matter of law that it did not owe patron a duty to protect him from criminal activity in its parking lot; the altercation occurred immediately after the Saturday night/Sunday morning crowd had been herded out of the bar at closing time and the bar had a history of reported incidents that gave it reason to contemplate further such incidents in its own parking lot.

Dunham’s Athleisure Corp. v. Shepherd, No. 18A-PL-2892, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 1, 2019).

May 6, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Trial court improperly denied summary judgment to firearm seller because the seller is immune from liability under Ind. Code 34-12-3-3.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 89
  • Page 90
  • Page 91
  • Page 92
  • Page 93
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 263
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs