Because the issues of fact were not material to the resolution of the case summary judgment was appropriate.
Civil
In re Name Change of M.E.B., No. 19A-MI-118, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 21, 2019).
AR 9 does not require that a transgender person requesting a name change provide evidence of violence occurring to that person because of gender identity or of violence being perpetrated against an Indiana resident who identifies as transgender.
In re Name Change of K.H., No. 18A-MI-3077, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 21, 2019).
The trial court improperly required that a person provide notice to the Attorney General of intent to waive publication and seal the record of a name change case pursuant to AR 9.
Burton v. Benner, No. 19A-CT-135, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 13, 2019).
Summary judgment should have been denied when the facts were without dispute, but the inferences that could be made from and conclusions that could be based on those facts can be disputed.
N.E. v. L.W., No. 18A-PO-2514, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 14, 2019).
The trial court erred in denying petition for a protection order on grounds that a no-contact order was in place.