• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Perkins v. Memorial Hospital of South Bend, No. 20S-CT-233, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 31, 2020).

April 6, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, M. Massa, Supreme

Testimony compelled by a subpoena or other statutory duty is protected under the public policy exception to at-will employment.

In re J.C., No. 20S-JT-235, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 1, 2020).

April 6, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Where the parent affirmatively waived the requirement, a parent is not entitled to dismissal of a TPR petition due to the juvenile court’s failure to complete a hearing within the statutorily required 180 days.

In re Paternity of M.S., No. 19A-JP-1595, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 6, 2020).

April 6, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas, N. Vaidik

The time period relevant to establishing a de facto custodianship excludes any period of time after a child custody proceeding has been commenced and while it is pending. After a child custody proceeding has been commenced and has concluded, however, the calculation of the time relevant to a de facto custodian determination is not tolled.

Furbee v. Wilson, No. 19A-PL-1756, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 30, 2020).

March 30, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Before a landlord makes a decision about a tenant’s request for an emotional-support animal, it can conduct a “meaningful review” to determine whether the accommodation is required; this review includes requesting documentation, such as information about the disability and the disability-related need for the animal, and opening a dialogue.

In re Paternity of C.B., No. 19A-JP-1618, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 18, 2020).

March 23, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

An attorney cannot litigate an award of attorney fees separate and apart from the client.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 71
  • Page 72
  • Page 73
  • Page 74
  • Page 75
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 263
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs