When city only provided notice of the taking and its hearings by publication, even though it knew how to provide personal notice, it deprived the property owner of a meaningful damages hearing.
Civil
William F. Braun Milk Hauling, Inc. v. Malanowski, No. 22A-CT-333, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 27, 2022).
Complaint was timely filed because the statute of limitations was tolled in 2020 by the Supreme Court’s orders regarding Covid-19.
Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Assoc. v. Finnerty, No. 21S-CT-409, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 19, 2022).
A trial court’s order on a repetitive motion or a motion to reconsider is an “other interlocutory order” under App. Rule 14(B).
The Court also creates a legal framework for determining whether good cause exists to limit or prohibit the deposition of a high-ranking official.
City of Gary v. Nicholson, No. 22S-MI-252, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 21, 2022).
Because plaintiffs allege no injury, they have no standing to challenge city ordinance.
Erie Ins. Exchange v. Craighead, No. 21A-CT-2871, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 12, 2022).
Medical payments coverage does not reduce an uninsured/underinsured motorist (“UIM”) coverage obligation.