• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

Humphrey v. State, No. 48S02-1609-PC-480, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 5, 2017).

May 9, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Massa, R. Rucker, Supreme

Post-conviction relief due to ineffective assistance of counsel was granted fifteen years after murder conviction affirmed on appeal and not barred by the doctrine of laches.

Escamilla v. Shiel Sexton Co., Inc., No. 54S01-1610-CT-546, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 4, 2017).

May 8, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Unauthorized immigrants can pursue claims for decreased earning capacity damages. Unauthorized immigration status is admissible only if the evidence’s proponent shows by a preponderance of evidence that the plaintiff will be deported.

KS & E Sports v. Runnels, No. 32S01-1704-PC-226, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 24, 2017).

May 1, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, R. Rucker, Supreme

A firearms seller is immune from a damages suit for injuries caused by another person’s misuse of a firearm, but the seller is not immune from a public nuisance claim seeking equitable relief.

Ryan v. TCI Architects/Engineers/Contractors, Inc., No. 49S02-1704-CT-253, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 26, 2017).

May 1, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

By entering into a contract containing language that required general contractor to assume responsibility for implementing and monitoring safety precautions and programs for all individuals working on the site, and by agreeing to designate a safety representative to supervise such implementation and monitoring, the general contractor affirmatively demonstrated an intent to assume a nondelegable duty of care toward the subcontractor.

Middleton v. State, No. 32S01-1704-PC-226, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 21, 2017).

April 24, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

In an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a petitioner need only show a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 75
  • Page 76
  • Page 77
  • Page 78
  • Page 79
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 178
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs