• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

D.A. v. State, No. 48S02-1604-MI-183, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Sept. 1, 2016).

September 6, 2016 Filed Under: Civil, Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

“Under the plain language of Indiana Code section 35-38-9-4, civil forfeitures are not included within the “conviction records” that may be expunged.”

Burnell v. State, No. 29S02-1512-CR-707, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 23, 2016).

August 29, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

A refusal to submit to a chemical test occurs when the conduct of the motorist is such that a reasonable person in the officer’s position would be justified in believing the motorist was capable of refusal and manifested an unwillingness to submit to the test.

Day v. State, No. 24C02-1501-CM-70, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 29, 2016).

August 29, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Indiana disorderly conduct statute (Ind. Code § 35-45-1-3) includes both public and private disturbances, but only physical, and not verbal, altercations.

In re R.S., No. 49S04-1606-JT-350, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 16, 2016).

August 22, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Given the loving bond parent and child share, parent’s successful completion of multiple self-improvement and parenting courses, parent’s successful completion of probation, parent’s repeatedly expressed desire to parent child, and his exercise of regular visitation with child, the trial court’s findings do not clearly and convincingly support its conclusion that termination of parental rights is in the best interests of the child.

Weaver v. State, No. 32S04-1608-CR-415, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 4, 2016).

August 8, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Driver who was unable to produce his driver’s license, avoided answering request for his address, evaded questions about his name, and repeatedly refused to provide his date of birth, was guilty of violating refusal-to-identify statute at Ind. Code § 34-28-5-3.5.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 74
  • Go to page 75
  • Go to page 76
  • Go to page 77
  • Go to page 78
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 170
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs