Although properly admitted evidence was not relevant to his alleged crimes at a joint trial, defendant waived his fair trial argument because he never moved for a separate trial and he first raised the issue at oral argument.
Supreme
Hurley v. State, No. 49S05-1705-CR-346, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 31, 2017).
Unless an individual clearly manifests an unwillingness to submit to a breathalyzer, a law-enforcement officer must administer a second test if the first returns an “insufficient sample” message.
Pinner v. State, No. 49S02-1611-CR-610, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 9, 2017).
Police need more than a tip that someone is carrying a handgun to conduct a lawful search and seizure; there must be evidence from which an inference of criminal activity can be drawn.
Love v. State, No. 71S03-1612-CR-00641, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 11, 2017).
Appellate courts must apply the same standard of review to video evidence as to other evidence, unless the video evidence indisputably contradicts the trial court’s findings.
Sims v. Pappas, No. 45S03-1701-CT-26, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 11, 2017).
Prior alcohol-related driving convictions can be introduced into evidence for the issue of punitive damages and the remoteness of a prior offense does not affect the admissibility of the evidence.