• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

KS & E Sports v. Runnels, No. 32S01-1704-PC-226, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 24, 2017).

May 1, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, R. Rucker, Supreme

A firearms seller is immune from a damages suit for injuries caused by another person’s misuse of a firearm, but the seller is not immune from a public nuisance claim seeking equitable relief.

Ryan v. TCI Architects/Engineers/Contractors, Inc., No. 49S02-1704-CT-253, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 26, 2017).

May 1, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

By entering into a contract containing language that required general contractor to assume responsibility for implementing and monitoring safety precautions and programs for all individuals working on the site, and by agreeing to designate a safety representative to supervise such implementation and monitoring, the general contractor affirmatively demonstrated an intent to assume a nondelegable duty of care toward the subcontractor.

Middleton v. State, No. 32S01-1704-PC-226, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 21, 2017).

April 24, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

In an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a petitioner need only show a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.

McKeen v. Turner, No. 53S05-1704-CT-202, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 7, 2017).

April 10, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Plaintiff may raise any theories of alleged malpractice during litigation following the Medical Review Panel process if (1) the proposed complaint encompasses the theories, and (2) the evidence relating to those theories was before the Medical Review Panel.

State v. Smith, No. 45S05-1611-CR-572, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 28, 2017).

April 3, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

Defendant’s plea agreement foreclosing the possibility of sentence conversion was not altered by a subsequent statute allowing courts to modify a post-sentence conviction.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 67
  • Go to page 68
  • Go to page 69
  • Go to page 70
  • Go to page 71
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 170
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs