• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

Barcroft v. State, No. 18S-CR-135, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 3, 2018).

December 10, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, M. Massa, Supreme

The evidence of defendant’s demeanor—taken together with the flaws in the expert opinion testimony and the absence of a well-documented history of mental illness—was sufficient to support the court’s finding of guilty but mentally ill (GBMI).

Schuler v. State, No. 31S00-1703-LW-134, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 4, 2018).

December 10, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Trial courts must comply with the requirements of Harrison v. State, in a clear and specific written sentencing statement, when imposing a sentence for the death penalty or LWOP.

State v. Reinhart, No. 18S-MI-286, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 5, 2018).

December 10, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

When a person “forfeits” driving privileges for life following a felony conviction for driving while suspended, the proper venue is the trial court in a person’s county of residence.

Town of Ellettsville v. DeSpirito, No. 53S01-1709-PL-612, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 29, 2018).

December 3, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

Relocating a fixed easement requires the consent of all affected estate-holders.

Weisheit v. State, No. 10S00-1507-PD-413, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 7, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: G. Slaughter, L. Rush, S. David, Supreme

Defendant’s conviction of the murders of two children, arson, death penalty sentence affirmed; finding that although mistakes were made by trial and appellate counsel most of them did not rise to the level of deficient performance under the Strickland decision, and defendant in any case failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 51
  • Go to page 52
  • Go to page 53
  • Go to page 54
  • Go to page 55
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 170
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs