• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

C.S. v. State, No. 19S-JV-137, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 1, 2019).

October 7, 2019 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: C. Goff, S. David, Supreme

Ind. Admin. Rule 14(B) permits remote participation in juvenile disposition-modification hearings where the parties have agreed or where the court issues a good cause order based on the factors listed in the rule including the child’s best interest.

Easler v. State, No. 19S-CR-324, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Sept. 20, 2019).

September 23, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, Supreme

When a party requests a hearing on possible juror bias or misconduct, after voir dire and selection but before the jury is sworn, a trial court should hold such a hearing if the party demonstrates some relevant basis for that bias or misconduct.

Paquette v. State, No. 19S-CR-502, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Sept. 11, 2019).

September 16, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

The proper sentence to avoid double jeopardy violation, where defendant caused three deaths while operating a vehicle under the influence of drugs and fleeing police, was guilt for one count of Level 3 felony resisting law enforcement causing death; two counts of Level 4 felony operating causing death; and one count of Level 6 felony operating causing serious bodily injury.

Rainbow Realty Group, Inc. v. Carter, No. 19S-CC-38, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Sept. 13, 2019).

September 16, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

“Rent-to-buy” agreement was not a land-sale contract, but a rental agreement subject to Indiana’s residential landlord-tenant statutes.

Faith v. State, No. 19S-PC-499, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Sept. 6, 2019).

September 9, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Per Curiam, Supreme

A trial court may impose consecutive advisory sentences in a case involving multiple acts of child molestation against a single victim.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 46
  • Go to page 47
  • Go to page 48
  • Go to page 49
  • Go to page 50
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 173
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs