• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

City of Bloomington Board of Zoning Appeals v. UJ-Eighty Corp., No. 21S-PL-77, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 23, 2021).

March 1, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

City did not delegate zoning authority to university, but defined fraternities and sororities in zoning law based on their relationship with the university.

Cooper’s Hawk Indianapolis, LLC v. Ray, No. 21S-CT-56, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 9, 2021).

February 15, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

A belated notice of appeal needs to do more than restate the grounds for granting a discretionary appeal; an extraordinary compelling reason to restore the forfeited appeal must be stated.

Anderson v. State, 21S-CR-28, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 26, 2021).

February 1, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Before counsel’s appointment, a trial court must consider a defendant’s pro se motion, like a request for an early trial. After counsel’s appointment, this consideration is left to the trial court’s discretion

Tate v. State, 19S-LW-444, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 28, 2021).

February 1, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

Defendant was sentenced to life without parole. The record contained substantial evidence of both the torture and child-molest aggravators on which the jury could reasonably rely. However, because there was a third unchallenged aggravator, torture and child-molest aggravators notwithstanding, any error would not have altered the jury’s recommendation or the trial court’s decision to impose life without parole

Hartman v. BigInch Fabricators & Construction Holding Co., Inc., No. 20S-PL-00618, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 28, 2021).

February 1, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Parties’ freedom to contract may permit “minority” and “marketability” discounts for valuing corporate shares even for shares in a closed-market transaction.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 32
  • Go to page 33
  • Go to page 34
  • Go to page 35
  • Go to page 36
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 172
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs