The plain view exception to the warrant requirement may justify the seizure of a vehicle believed to be the fruit, instrumentality, or evidence of a crime provided that police are lawfully in a position from which to view the vehicle, its incriminating character is immediately apparent, and police have a lawful right of access to the vehicle.
Supreme
State v. Ellis, 21S-CR-159, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 26, 2021).
When a defendant is processed for home detention, a waiver of the “rights against search and seizure” clearly encompasses the right to be free from search and seizure absent reasonable suspicion.
New Nello Operating Co., LLC v CompressAir, No. 20S-CC-578, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 22, 2021).
Continuity of ownership is necessary for the de-facto-merger and mere-continuation exceptions to apply to the buyer acquiring the seller’s assets, but not its liabilities.
Branscomb v. Wal-mart Stores East, L.P., No. 20S-CQ-515, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 7, 2021).
Store manager cannot be held liable for negligence when he is not directly involved in the accident at issue.
Harris v. State, 20S-CR-546, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Mar. 24, 2021).
Although Indiana Rule of Evidence 615(c) is the proper vehicle to permit a parent-witness to remain in the courtroom despite a separation-of witnesses order, the exception is not automatic; child defendants must still affirmatively show their parent’s presence is “essential.”